American
vampires have huge fangs ÐÐ thatÕs been my beef with the genre for some time.
Like, dude, you donÕt look like youÕre on a liquid diet. Then thereÕs the roar that accompanies the
display, forecasting a carnivoreÕs lunchtime and followed by a
neck-breaking attack. The problem may be that flesh-eating zombies had such
an impact as the sole visual innovation in horror films of the last 40
years. (Does anyone remember Tilda SwintonÕs jugular-ripping scene in Edward
II by Derek
Jarman, sans fangs? ÐÐ she was my choice for Gabriele, LestatÕs mother.)
Luckily, the blood-drinkers in Rosencrantz and
Guildenstern Are Undead sport rather modest ÐÐ proportionate to their skull size ÐÐ
fangs. Writer/director Jordan Galland seems even aware of the prevalent
zombie/vampire confusion. Young New Yorker Julian (Jake Hoffman, Dustin
progeny) initially takes the play he is directing to be about the voodoo
variation. His best friend Vince, cast by Jake to play Hamlet, witnesses a
vampiric picnic and quivers: ÒLike they were eating her or something!Ó But no
such luck for the gay-acting duo (a ploy to deflect the jealousy of
JulianÕs ex-girlfriendÕs Mafioso paramour). The
playwright/star is a deathly pale Eastern European who goes by the name of
Theo Horace (John Ventimiglia).
The film opens with a young woman (Bijou Phillips) rehearsing her
Jules Feifferesque "interpretive dance" alone in a blackbox theater somewhere on the
lower East Side. With fairy wings on her back. That she becomes the first
victim of TheoÕs bloodlust goes without saying.
While the vampires of old tended to be princely loners,
theyÕve lately been multiplying like, well, zombies, forming covens,
kingdoms and theater companies. Chalk it up to declining infant mortality
or something. Soon, JulianÕs ex- Anna (the supermodel-turned-Sin City assassin Devon Aoki) is
auditioning for the role of Ophelia. And Theo recognizes ÒhisÓ Ophelia
(gee, IÕve heard that before). And a mysterious woman warns Vince that the
production is being mounted in order to harvest willing victims (that
sounds familiar, too). Is vampirism here a metaphor for the nocturnal
habits of the theater folks? For the limbo that actors are condemned to
languish in? A poke at HollywoodÕs obsession with eternal youth? R &
G does not
concern itself with such life-or-death trivialities. What it does instead
is to flog the dead horse, until it starts limping with us on its undead
back.
Shot on the ultra-high-definition red camera, Rosencrantz is at times rather beautiful
to look at. TheoÕs puffy and powdered visage floats in the darkness of the
theater, onstage in a white spot against black drapes.
Sean LennonÕs
light-hearted score, together with uproarious one-liner act titles, keep
things moving. Jake Hoffman has the Keanu Reeves blankness down pat, and
itÕs gratifying to see that Devon Aoki can act, and well. The two actors
who play Rosencrantz (clueless dude) and Guildenstern (acteur) are a howl
and a scream. TheoÕs vamps supply dead-on glares and flares (nostril).
Add TheDa Vinci Code, Raiders of the Lost Ark to the
vampire-meets-Shakespeare-meets-Woody Allen-meets-Monty Python, and now
enters Charlotte Lawrence (a hilarious Geneva Kerr), the keeper of a 2,000
year-old secret. Instead of a bunch of old men in hoods, this middle-aged
woman with a penchant for ridiculous disguises is apparently the sole
member of a Òsecret society.Ó The names of the title characters become a
coded allusion to grail seekers and alchemists in GallandÕs Dudist translation.
When Anna, believing that Julian had brought her to a dentistÕs office,
asks ÒRosicrucians and Goldenstonians? WhatÕs that?Ó Julian answers, ÒItÕs
ye olde English for root canal and golden crown.Ó
Charlotte explains the genre conventions with evolution and
randomness. They hate garlic, they don't like crossesÉwith one exception:
When vampires are staked, they turn into skeletons, not dust. This rule
breaker goes unexplained until we meet the ÒrealÓ Hamlet ÐÐ an annoying
blond ham the audience goes hog-wild for ÐÐ in the final act, before a
disappointingly predictable ending.
Can
a single film function as a parody of multiple genres? Does a good parody
require devotion to one or two? Galland wisely abandoned the quest and
chose anarchy instead. He seems to have gone back again and again into his
own script to dig and dissect every line heÕs written for more jokes. The
result is a chucklefest from beginning to end, about ÐÐ a great relief ÐÐ
itself.
ÐÐ
Rika Ohara
Disclosure: The
editor-in-chief of Bluefat is
a descendant of the founding Grand Master of the Knights Templar.