"John Lennon
represented life, and Mr. Nixon
and Mr. Bush represent death." So says Gore Vidal, succinctly, in one of
the many testimonials by friends and ex-foes to the former Beatle in The
U.S. vs. John Lennon which
traces Lennon's life from lonely, rebellious orphan to international
teenbeat idol to politically engaged fist raiser to cross-generational
cultural emblem. Outwardly focused on the American government's persecution
and attempted deportation of Lennon and his partner,
Yoko Ono, for
countercultural activities deemed dangerous by the Nixon administration,
David Leaf and John Scheinfeld's documentary/love letter comes at a time
when parallels to current affairs would seem obvious.
Leaf and Scheinfeld
draw these parallels in a series of scenes that highlight Lennon's
performances at political rallies and at contentious or fawning press
conferences, intercut with the expected gooey-sweetie stuff between him and
Ono. It's a high-sheen, fast-moving work, which has the look, feel and
sound of the VH1 broadcast it in fact is, in tandem with in its theatrical release. Produced
with the blessing of Ono (who gave the filmmakers access to previously
unseen archival footage and photos), and illustrating in vivid pictorial
the remarkable detective work of Jon Wiener's book Gimme Some Truth: The
John Lennon FBI Files, the film
is a gripping and moving homage that brings in some new-old faces to flank
the usual suspects in telling the story of Lennon and his badgering by the
FBI: Mario Cuomo, George McGovern, John Dean, a comforting Walter Cronkite,
a scarily unrepentant G. Gordon Liddy and a surprisingly cogent Geraldo
Rivera.
The film opens with
scenes from the 1971 benefit in Ann Arbor, Michigan, for political activist
John Sinclair, who'd been sentenced to 10 years in state prison for selling
two marijuana cigarettes to an undercover agent. Lennon's appearance at the
concert, alongside Black Panther Bobby Seale, poet Allen Ginsberg and
inaugural Yippie Jerry Rubin, was monitored by the FBI, which knew the
event would draw wide attention to the Sinclair case and had planted
informants in the audience. Lennon chose the event as a warm-up for a
proposed whistle-stop concert tour that would follow the Nixon campaign
nationwide and mix music with anti-war demonstrations. The FBI's Lennon
files detail the Nixon administration's attempts to prevent the tour from
happening and to put Lennon further out of Nixon-harming way.
As a record of the
intermingling of rock music with anti-war and civil rights activism in the
late '60s and early '70s, the film retreads a lot of ground that's been
detailed before, particularly in Andrew Solt's 1988 documentary Imagine:
John Lennon, which similarly
attempted to convey the complexities of a man seriously engaged with the
political and cultural tumult of his times yet increasingly conscious of
his essentially limited ability, as an artist, to effect change. Leaf and
Scheinfeld make a similar point in a digital-era package of artful,
rapid-cut editing and enhanced picture quality on archival footage.
Beefed-up audio on a well-chosen selection of Lennon's music, in both concert
and studio versions, adds to the film's considerable visceral slam.
The U.S. vs. John
Lennon propagandizes somewhat by
zeroing in on the open pores and shiny pates of the baddies and isolating
the colorfully tailored and lovable goodness of our hero. We see, for
example, a clip of Nixon telling a big whopper about the withdrawal of
troops in Southeast Asia, wiping the sweat from his upper lip. Quick cut to
next scene for cheap but satisfying laughs. More chilling sequences place
clips of Nixon speechifying righteous and cute against images of flaming
death in Vietnam, or students being battered bloody at protest rallies.
It was Lennon's
engaging drollery and sense of the absurd that made his forays into direct
and indirect political action to most of our liking, and often seemed the
only available human alternative to the cold proclamations of the more
rigidly revolutionary types who regarded him as a mere wealthy rock boy
playing at grown-up politics. And then there were those in the ostensibly
progressive-minded media establishment who viewed Lennon as nothing more
than a lightweight bigmouth with his head in the clouds. On that last
score, The U.S. vs. John Lennon
offers up the singer's famous, filmed confrontation with the ludicrously
snotty New York Times writer
Gloria Emerson, who calls Lennon "dear boy" as he heatedly attempts to
defend the role of the artist in political discourse. No devious editing
required here: Although Lennon seems to lose his composure in the
encounter, Emerson looks a clown all on her own.
When asked by a
reporter why he was always in trouble, Lennon preferred a response like "I
just have one of those faces, y'know, people never liked me face."
Repeatedly, he shed humorous human light on his politics, a stance that
often made him appear deceptively naive about his own real political
significance. That was ultimately the supposition of single-minded
idealists such as Jerry Rubin and Abbie Hoffman, who, without informing
Lennon, advertised his appearance at a rally outside the Republican
convention in Miami in 1972, in which Lennon then refused to participate.
Yet Lennon kept his cool when this kind of cynical leftist contempt was
shoved his way; always, he clarified that he and Yoko were artists, not
politicians, and certainly not intellectuals. And he really knew how to
push a program; as he shrewdly characterized it at his and Ono's infamous
"Bed-In" press conference, "We're sellin' it like soap: Peace or war,
that's the two products."
Lennon also said, "Our
society is run by insane people for insane objectives, so I'm liable to be
put away as insane for saying that." But he wasn't put away. He was
vindicated, his case played a major part in Nixon's eventual resignation,
and we're all a little bit transformed if for that reason alone. The
world's a bigger mess than it's ever been, but it's a better mess, and we
have dreamers like John Lennon to thank for that.